SpeechStep

Phonological Process Goals: Examples for Fronting, Stopping, Gliding, and More

✓ Reviewed against ASHA Selected Phonological Patterns, Storkel (2022), ASHA Practice PortalEvidence level consensusLast reviewed October 14, 2026Published October 14, 2026

Phonological goals target a pattern, not one sound — for example, “will produce K and G instead of fronting them to T and D.” Many are built around contrasting word pairs: minimal, maximal, or multiple oppositions, and a 2022 tutorial explains which fits which child. Example goals for common patterns below.

Pattern goals vs. sound goals

ASHA defines error patterns as systematic sound changes or simplifications that affect a class of sounds, sound combinations, or syllable structures. Because a pattern spans many sounds, a phonological goal is written around the pattern — and phonological contrast approaches use contrasting word pairs as targets instead of individual sounds, so the child learns that the sound change changes meaning.2

Like any school goal, it must still be measurable — ASHA notes goals are typically written as percentage accuracy or number of trials completed successfully.4

Example goals for common patterns

Illustrative goals; ages are when ASHA says each pattern usually disappears.
Pattern (usual age gone)What it sounds likeExample goal
Final-consonant deletion (3)“bu” for “bus”Will produce final consonants in CVC words contrasted with open syllables (bee/beet, bow/boat) in 8 of 10 trials
Stopping of /f, s/ (3)“pun” for “fun,” “tee” for “see”Will produce /f/ and /s/ in the initial position of words (fan/pan, sea/tea) with 80% accuracy
Fronting (4)“tat” for “cat”Will produce /k/ and /g/ in the initial position of words (key/tea, go/dough) in 8 of 10 trials
Cluster reduction (4 without /s/; 5 with /s/)“top” for “stop,” “keen” for “clean”Will produce /s/-clusters in the initial position of words (spot/pot, snail/nail) with 80% accuracy
Weak-syllable deletion (4)“nana” for “banana”Will produce all syllables in 3-syllable words with 80% accuracy
Gliding (6–7)“wabbit” for “rabbit”Will produce /r/ in the initial position of words (red/wed, ring/wing) with 80% accuracy

Illustrative goals; ages are when ASHA says each pattern usually disappears.1

Gliding is typical until 6–7, so it is usually targeted only in older children or when other patterns have resolved. The criterion and support level in each goal are set by the SLP and IEP team.1

Free target-word generator

Build a word list by sound and position in seconds — free, no account.

Try it free →

Choosing the contrast approach

Which contrastive approach fits which child (Storkel, 2022; ASHA).
ApproachWord pairsBest suited to
Minimal pairs (minimal oppositions)Error sound vs. target, differing by one feature (key/tea)Children with a small number of errors — older children or mild disorders
Maximal oppositionsTarget vs. a very different known sound (mall/call)Children with multiple errors across several sound classes
Multiple oppositionsOne error sound vs. several targets at once (door/four/chore/sore)Global phoneme collapse that hurts intelligibility

Which contrastive approach fits which child (Storkel, 2022; ASHA).3,2

The tutorial also walks through writing goals and choosing intensity for each approach, and notes that conventional minimal pairs, though the most familiar, should be restricted to children with few errors.3

Goals in the cycles approach

The cycles approach schedules patterns in cycles of 5 to 16 weeks and recycles them until they appear in spontaneous speech. ASHA notes there is no predetermined level of mastery within a cycle; cycles stimulate emergence of a pattern rather than drill it to mastery — so goals are written around emergence in spontaneous speech.2

Frequently asked questions

What is a phonological process goal?+

A goal aimed at eliminating an error pattern — a systematic change that affects a whole class of sounds, such as fronting all back sounds — rather than at one sound. ASHA describes phonological contrast approaches that use contrasting word pairs, instead of individual sounds, as targets.

What is an example of a fronting goal?+

For example: “In a minimal pair picture task, the student will produce /k/ and /g/ in the initial position of words (key/tea, go/dough) so the listener selects the correct picture in 8 of 10 trials.” Fronting usually disappears by about age 4, per ASHA.

Which contrast approach should a goal use?+

A 2022 tutorial recommends conventional minimal pairs for children with a small number of errors, maximal oppositions for children with multiple errors across several sound classes, and multiple oppositions for global phoneme collapses that affect intelligibility.

How do cycles approach goals differ?+

In the cycles approach, ASHA says patterns are targeted for set periods and recycled, with no predetermined mastery level within each cycle — the aim is to stimulate the emergence of a pattern, so goals focus on exposure and emergence rather than accuracy percentages.

Put this into practice today

Try the free target-word generator, or start daily AI speech practice — every child takes one SpeechStep at a time.

References

4 sources from authoritative bodies. Last reviewed October 2026.

  1. 1.ASHASelected Phonological Patterns — Practice Portal page.
  2. 2.ASHASpeech Sound Disorders: Articulation and Phonology — Practice Portal page.
  3. 3.Peer-reviewedStorkel — Minimal, Maximal, or Multiple: Which Contrastive Intervention Approach to Use With Children With Speech Sound Disorders? — Clinical tutorial (LSHSS), 2022.
  4. 4.ASHADocumentation in Schools — Practice Portal page.

Keep reading